Ball State University. English 104
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
filednotes 7
A guy in his fifties is leading the meeting.. he talks about how hes gotta stay sober for his kids
--this makes me happy!
Another guy talks about how hes been sober for nine years
---HOLY SHIT!
there are a bunch of people from ball state nursing in the meeting
---I feel like i know more than them.. i feel cool!
another man talks about how he is a trucker and how he would get drunk at the truck stops and that one day his partner got sick of him and just left him in muncie indiana with nothing and that hes been here ever since
---thats just scary.. im blown away
he tells us that he has his dream car, a house, and pays for his kids child support now that he is sober
--- im glad hes on the right track
another guy says that its the people in this room that keep him coming back
--- I think that the support of others is crucial for alcoholics
We say the serenity prayer
--- I know all the traditions now and i feel as if i fit in and have authority
fieldnotes 6
A boy walks in that looks a lot younger than me
---I wonder why he is here
an old man is going to lead the meeting
---i hope he doesnt put me to sleep
start to talk about the stories and the younger boy tells us he got a DUI and his parents are making him attend thirty meetings in thirty days
---Ive heard that this is a common thing for people to do
asks if anyone wants a coin and no one needs one
---i want to ask for one but im too afraid!
An older lady made snacks for the meeting
---YUUUM! glad i came to this one
We talk about how important is to make amends with people -- well alcoholics.. for people they have hurt
---i think i could probably do this with a couple people myself.. even though im not an alcoholic
everyone tells about who they hurt in there life.. i say my mom.. because ive put her through a lot in my day
---i think the people respect that i am participating
meeting ends the normal way
---smiles :)
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Peer Review- Haley Clark
1. Does it pose a question? Does the paper identify tensions? Does it say what it’s going to do and what its point is?
She wants to get a closer look and discover the interesting world that people who participate in medieval recreations live in...
Theme
2. What is the quality of the content of the writing: the ideas, perceptions, and point of view? In your words, what is being said? Is it more than a collection of thoughts and observations? According to the author, why does this whole thing matter?
I think that shes trying to say that there is really no way to define normalcy. No one has the authority to say what is normal and what isn't and if you do than you are very close-minded. She does a great job of telling us what she is thinking through the whole research process.
3. Is there too much abstraction or generalization? Underline or circle this language in the paper. In other words, are there so few details, examples and explanations that it ends up dull, empty, impossible to experience? Or, perhaps even impossible to understand? Explain.
In the interview with Sarah.. the part starting with "sometimes.. when i.." was kind of hard to understand. Sarah is an older lady and at the beginning it says that she would be interacting with people that are her age.
4. Is there too little abstraction or generalization and too much clutter of details, examples, and explanations? Too little standing back for perspective? Too little forest per tree?
I think there is a little bit too much generalization.. She needs to get a little bit deeper and look for an interesting thing to talk about that no one would think of. Nothing really made me say 'WOWWWW.. i would have never guessed!' So she might want to work on that a bit.
5. What is the practical significance of the artifact? What idea does it represent?
She talked about a cross-stich, but needs to get into greater detail about it. I think its cool that the cross-stich is used as a sort of promise ring for people in relationships.
6. What is the significance of Interview 1? Tells us an insiders perspective of what others think say about the subculture and if they wear there clothes out in public. They don't really care that the outfits might look funny because they like them and its like their uniform.
7. What is the significance of Interview 2? Talks about the group possibly becoming mainstream and the stereotypes an insider thinks there are
8. Are all 3 required scholarly sources developed in the conclusions? NO
9. Is all source material cited according to MLA, both parenthetically and in a Works Cited?
No works cited provided
10. Do the conclusions satisfy the issues the study raises with complexity? How so?
I think that the conclusions should have more complexity to them. They should be more interesting and stand out.
Structure
11. Is the whole thing unified? Is there a central idea to which everything pertains?
What? Are there loose ends that don’t seem purposefully so, but accidently overlooked?
Its unified, but missing some things... Like an artifact. Everything pertains to her trying to either banish or affirm the stereotypes
12. Are the parts arranged in a coherent, logical narrative sequence?
They seemed to be in the right order.. Purpose,Background,Interviews, Conclusion
13. Were the paragraphs really paragraphs? Could you tell what each one was saying? Did they function as helpful and comfortable units of thought, not too much, not too little? Mark any that seem too short or too long.
Some of the paragraphs need to be broken up.. At one point there is a whole page that doesn't have any indentations. I could tell what each was saying.
Language
14. Are the sentences clear and readable? Underline with a wavy line any that you find incorrect or confusing.
The sentences seem to have good structure and are readable. Nothing confused me except for the cross-stich part.
15. Are the words used correctly? List any misused words. Words are used correctly.
16. Is it succinct enough? Not too long, repetitious or dull? Mark any areas for deletion.
I think that the subjective positions and background make it a little dull...It was hard to keep my attention because I thought those things were a bit unnecessary.
17. Is it full enough? Or does the writer squeeze out the juice of human communication and spoken discourse? Is the language, even if correct, dull and indigestible? Does the writer sufficiently use the language of the subculture?
She talks about Cross-stich and larpers. It's not full enough because it is missing details about artifacts. Add more language from the subculture!
18. Does the diction, mood and level of formality fit with ethnography?
The mood seems to flow throughtout the paper and fits with the ethnography.. She should dig a little deeper.. Maybe a bit too formal.
Readerly Response
Describe what was happening to you as you read. Tell which words or phrases stuck out or resonated.
I didn't know what stigma meant.. So i learned something! The larper part was interesting to me.
What happened and what are the implications?
The stereotypes of them being a bit geeky are confirmed, but the people in the subculture don't mind and almost like being that way.
What ideas or beliefs or feelings were brought into this piece? How do multiple points of view contribute to your understanding?
The subculture is more based on historical accuracy than the mythical aspect which i found interesting. She should add more points of view and thoughts.
What understanding of the culture do you have from reading this piece? What gave you this understanding?
The understanding I've gained is that they don't mind that people think they are geeky or whatever. They kind of just do their own thing which I respect. The interviews helped to give me this understanding
The writer has introduced him/herself to you. Describe that meeting. What’s your impression? Did he thrust out his hand for you to shake? Did she sidle up next to you, but fail to look you in the eye? Did he send you a letter bomb or put his arm around your shoulder? Does it seem like the writer is standing on a cliff talking down to an audience below? What sense of the writer do you have? Formal? Casual? Intimate? Jocular? Arrogant? Are you with the writer, against her, or unsure since you don’t really know him?
I'd like to see more emotions in the writing. More feeling.. It's really casual.. Not very intimate. I'm with the writer because I have been in class with her. Her voice is kind of drowned out.
Is the writer giving in?
The writer needs to gain more authority
What do you want, need, or wish for?
I want to see more details and research.. more explanation about the artifacts. Maybe a little bit about the history and where medieval recreations began?
Peer Review- Emily Yu
1. Does it pose a question? Does the paper identify tensions? Does it say what it’s going to do and what its point is?
The paper says that she wants to find out if the Koreans had experienced the same hardships she had when first coming to America. She explains that there is tension between her subculture and the Korean subculture It doesn't really say exactly what she is going to do or what type of fieldwork she'll be getting into.
Theme
2. What is the quality of the content of the writing: the ideas, perceptions, and point of view? In your words, what is being said? Is it more than a collection of thoughts and observations? According to the author, why does this whole thing matter?
The paper is only five pages long. She is somewhat on the right track but needs to polish up her ideas and add more. Her point of view might be a little biased because of the myths she had grown up hearing. I'm not sure if it will matter in the end because the paper isn't completed.
3. Is there too much abstraction or generalization? Underline or circle this language in the paper. In other words, are there so few details, examples and explanations that it ends up dull, empty, impossible to experience? Or, perhaps even impossible to understand? Explain.
There are a lot of run-ons and things that don't really make sense.. A lot of rambling and unnecessary information. there really isn't enough to the paper for me to make assumptions, it seems a little dull
4. Is there too little abstraction or generalization and too much clutter of details, examples, and explanations? Too little standing back for perspective? Too little forest per tree?
There is too much clutter of details.. Good Background story ... No interviews or artifacts.. Not much perspective
5. What is the practical significance of the artifact? What idea does it represent?
There is no artifact in the paper
6. What is the significance of Interview 1? no interview
7. What is the significance of Interview 2? no interview
8. Are all 3 required scholarly sources developed in the conclusions? No.
9. Is all source material cited according to MLA, both parenthetically and in a Works Cited?
No works cited.
10. Do the conclusions satisfy the issues the study raises with complexity? How so?
There are no conclusions in the paper
Structure
11. Is the whole thing unified? Is there a central idea to which everything pertains?
What? Are there loose ends that don’t seem purposefully so, but accidently overlooked?
It's hard to tell because it's only 5 pages
12. Are the parts arranged in a coherent, logical narrative sequence?
They start off fine... Needs to finish the paper
13. Were the paragraphs really paragraphs? Could you tell what each one was saying?
Did they function as helpful and comfortable units of thought, not too much, not too little? Mark any that seem too short or too long.
The paragraphs were split up into logical parts. I could tell what she was trying to say. Some thoughts ramble.
Language
14. Are the sentences clear and readable? Underline with a wavy line any that you find incorrect or confusing.
Some of the sentences don't have proper sentence structure... There are a few run ons in the paper
15. Are the words used correctly? List any misused words.
It says pauper people? I don't what that means...
16. Is it succinct enough? Not too long, repetitious or dull? Mark any areas for deletion.
There is some unnecessary information and rambling.. Could use a little spice!
17. Is it full enough? Or does the writer squeeze out the juice of human communication and spoken discourse? Is the language, even if correct, dull and indigestible? Does the writer sufficiently use the language of the subculture?
The language of the subculture isnt provided. The paper isn't full enough because it isn't finished. I think she said she had too much going on and couldnt finish it..
18. Does the diction, mood and level of formality fit with ethnography?
Yes... so far.. its a good topic for her because of the myths shes heard all of her life.. Hopefully it will prove to be a good experience for her...I look forward to seeing it finished.
Readerly Response
Describe what was happening to you as you read. Tell which words or phrases stuck out or resonated.
The myths were interesting to me.. There seems to be a rivalry between her subculture and the one she chose to study.
What happened and what are the implications?
Nothing has happened yet... I assume that there may be implications because of the rivalry between the subcultures
What ideas or beliefs or feelings were brought into this piece? How do multiple points of view contribute to your understanding?
No other points of view... Needs to add interviews and what type of worldviews the subculture has
What understanding of the culture do you have from reading this piece? What gave you this understanding?
I have no understanding of the subculture except for her prior feelings about it.
The writer has introduced him/herself to you. Describe that meeting. What’s your impression? Did he thrust out his hand for you to shake? Did she sidle up next to you, but fail to look you in the eye? Did he send you a letter bomb or put his arm around your shoulder? Does it seem like the writer is standing on a cliff talking down to an audience below? What sense of the writer do you have? Formal? Casual? Intimate? Jocular? Arrogant? Are you with the writer, against her, or unsure since you don’t really know him?
She seems really sweet and a nice person. I don't think that she actually takes the myths to heart which is good. The writing is pretty casual. I'd like to see more emotions in the writing and more about how she feels.
Is the writer giving in? I'm not sure
What do you want, need, or wish for?
I'm curious to know how her meetings and interviews went! She needs to finish her paper! I'm sure it will be very interesting!
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
-It's very comfortable. Everyone is really inviting and friendly. The alcoholics don't care that I am there.. If anything they see it as support. I think they like it when people visit because then they can get their own understanding of how the subculture really is and banish any stereotypes.
-I have represented them in a good way. I have made it clear that everyone is struggling with something inside and for these people it just happens to be alcohol. It is truly a life-threatening disease and I think people will respect alcoholics a lot more after hearing what I have to say.
I think that I have some amount of authority. I am allowed to and even have, ran the meetings before. Even though anyone can run them, I still felt very honored. I wasn't an alcoholic before and I'm not now, but I think that I have lived vicariously through some of the people and gotten into their heads. The information they've shared with me has really given me a credible sense of authority.
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Maggie Carter Peer Review
1.How does the writer reflect on the interview process? Are the internal thoughts of the writer towards the informant expressed? Quote at least 3 examples.
-I didn't notice internal thoughts of the writer directer at the informant. Mostly provided information on what the informants said and not direct quotes about the questions she asked them.
2.What differences in terms of race, class, gender, etc. are discussed regarding each informant? List examples from each interview segment.
- I don't know much about Sam by the description , I can assume that they are in the same grade. Spencer is a freshman here and is a tall, skinny, boy.
3.How does the writer characterize his or her informant? Do you think there should be more physical description, material description, background, or nonverbal communication to better understand the person and interaction?
-Background info was good... describe nonverbal communication and a physical description of Sam.
4.Do the informants seem to be full characters you could describe with unique worldviews? Quote any examples that helped you know the informant’s worldview.
-I could not assume worldviews accept that they prolly support things like gay marriage and such.
5.Each interview should be distinct from the other and in narrative form. What is the story being told about each interview? Describe them separately here.
She goes back home to interview Sam and the second interview is done here at school.
6.What is the thesis for interview 1? What is the thesis for interview 2? Are these theses truly theses—that is, do they make surprising and specific claims that need support to be accepted by an audience? If not, what’s the problem?
thesis 1- judgement
thesis 2-judgement
The main theme here is judgement but that isnt very surprising to me.. she should dig a little deeper!
Does there seem to be a balance of summary and quotation? Or does one mode seem overused or underused?
More interview, less summary :)
For each interview, what do you think the writer most wanted to know?
1- she wanted to know about when they first came out and what people think about it
2-wanted to know how his parents felt about it
What is the verbal art discussed? Do you think it fits the criteria of verbal art? What’s the deeper level of meaning for the culture?
a piercing maybe?... it doesnt really fit though... needs to add some verbal art!
What new knowledge do you have after reading these interviews? What would you still like to know about the culture?
I knew most of what she talked about just from observing that culture in everyday life
On your copy cross out any portions of the paper you think are irrelevant to understanding the informant, the culture, or the writer’s perspective. Don’t be shy. The writer doesn’t have to take your advice.
Comment on the organization. Does it seem to be working?
Working.. just need more detail
Comment on the writing style. Is it gripping enough to hold an average reader’s attention?
yeah i feel like i can hear her talking when i read it but maybe thats just cause shes in my class!... add more interesting and shocking details that people wouldnt know about!
What’s the single most important thing this writer could do to improve this paper before it’s graded?
just adddd more... get deeper into the subculture?!
Lizzie Abel Peer Review
1. How does the writer reflect on the interview process? Are the internal thoughts of the writer towards the informant expressed? Quote at least 3 examples.
-She should try being a little bit more daring during the interview process. She asked questions that people would ask in normal conversation like, "Were you nervous to join the architecture program?." I feel like that's something my mom would ask me when If I came home for the weekend. She asks, "Were you nervous, like, when you first walked in?" When reading, I felt like I already knew the response before continuing on. He replies by discussing the seat assignment. I think its just a universal truth that you better pick your seat wisely because you have to be around those people all semester.
2. What differences in terms of race, class, gender, etc. are discussed regarding each informant? List examples from each interview segment.
-The first informant is her friend and i would assume is her age. She didn't provide much information on the second informant.
3.How does the writer characterize his or her informant? Do you think there should be more physical description, material description, background, or nonverbal communication to better understand the person and interaction?
-She did a great job of providing a visual picture of the first informant using many descriptive words, however didn't seem to do the same for the second informant. Maybe describe the nonverbal communication a little bit more? Don't neglect the second informant
4. Do the informants seem to be full characters you could describe with unique worldviews? Quote any examples that helped you know the informant’s worldview.
-I would have no idea what type of worldviews these people would have. I could assume based on the description she gave about Alexander- "It's age could symbolize how down to earth Alexander is" that he is probably very chill and has mellow worldviews, although i wouldn't even be able to assume Kileys.
5. Each interview should be distinct from the other and in narrative form. What is the story being told about each interview? Describe them separately here.
-The first informant is interviewed in Lizzie's dorm room and she talks about how she has been good friends with Alexander for a couple years now. I didn't notice the second interview take on a narrative form.
6.What is the thesis for interview 1? What is the thesis for interview 2? Are these theses truly theses—that is, do they make surprising and specific claims that need support to be accepted by an audience? If not, what’s the problem?
1- I found it neat that the different architecture students could all get along with each other, yet at the same time form smaller groups within each other.
2- can't put my finger on it
They aren't very surprising.. I would say the facts are self-explanatory or could be assumed fairly easy.
6.Does there seem to be a balance of summary and quotation? Or does one mode seem overused or underused?
-I would say there is a good balance between summary and quotation.
7.For each interview, what do you think the writer most wanted to know?
-The basic facts of the subculture of architecture
8. What is the verbal art discussed? Do you think it fits the criteria of verbal art? What’s the deeper level of meaning for the culture?
-I didn't see anything about verbal art. She said that she looked for some and couldn't find any. She provided a description of his outfit and that this indicated he was down to earth, but didn't connect that with the subculture.
9.What new knowledge do you have after reading these interviews? What would you still like to know about the culture?
-I learned that a lot of people don't know anything about the architecture program?
10. On your copy cross out any portions of the paper you think are irrelevant to understanding the informant, the culture, or the writer’s perspective. Don’t be shy. The writer doesn’t have to take your advice.
Comment on the organization. Does it seem to be working?
-It's organized. but I only found one thesis.. I think that there should be a thesis after each interview and then a paragraph combining the too or similarities/differences of the two interviews
Comment on the writing style. Is it gripping enough to hold an average reader’s attention?
-I enjoyed her style of writing and word usage. It held my attention
What’s the single most important thing this writer could do to improve this paper before it’s graded?
-just add more detail and put more interesting facts that I would have never thought of
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Fieldnotes 5
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
FIeldnotes 4
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
interview after feedback
• Taylor: Do you think that the people that attend them get better or do you think its worse for them?
• Cole: I think most of them are faking because they are court ordered or someone is making them go…
She helped me realize the importance of saying words like hmm and I see.. to make the informant feel comfortable and show them that I cared about what they said.
Alcoholics Slang- list of 15
2. juiced: intoxicated; drunk.
3. mellow: a pleasant drunk
4. loaded: intoxicated
5. pickled: drunk
6. shit-faced: obscene, out of control drunk
7.tipsy: slightly intoxicated
8. dipsomania: an insatiable craving for alcoholic beverages
9. drunkard: alcoholic
10. lush: alcoholic
11. alky: alcoholic
12. rummy: alcoholic
13. boozer: alcoholic
14. KIS: keep it simple
15. running the show: How devout members of AA describe the attitude and actions of an alcoholic who is not following the principles of the Twelve-Step program and the Big Book.
"Always remember that I have taken more out of alcohol than alcohol has taken out of me."
"Don’t drink and drive, you might hit a bump and spill your drink."
"Time is never wasted when you’re wasted all the time."
"I drink to forget I drink"
Fieldnotes #3
Oral History
Verbal Art
The verbal art I chose in my subculture is at the end of the meetings when they say the Lord's prayer to close, while all holding hands, and then shout the phrase, "It works If you work it!"
What is the culture revealed?
The culture reveals that the members rely heavily on working the twelve steps and that God is a huge foundation of their recovery. It also shows me that the people are bonding by holding hands. I think that this probably makes them feel good to do this at the end because it's something fun, but serious at the same time.
How is it important to IND, GROUP, YOU?
This is important to them because it really does remind them at the end that they need to continue working the steps until the next meeting. When I do it with the group, I am really happy after wards for some reason. I think that it gives me a sense of hope for the members.
Questions?
I need to ask someone if the verbal art is important to them in an interview. I'll also ask if any one knows how that got started and If it's just in Indiana or everywhere....
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Potential questions to ask at interview
Interview in class
summary 2-'naught but a story'
- Bill W. (1949) "The society of Alcoholics Anonymous' American Journal of Psychiatry 106(5): 370-375
- Lindy, C (1993) Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence Oxford University Press: New York and Oxford
summary 1 - therapy-directed strategy increases AA involvement among outpatients
- Walitzer KS: Facilitating Involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous during outpatient treatment: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction 2009; 104:391-401
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Fieldnotes #2
there are 5 people that have walked in
wonder what step we'll cover today .. one of the guys looks mid-twenties, one looks like he is in highschool, another in his thirties, a lady in her forties, and an old man in the room.
this meeting place is a lot smaller than the last one, has a long conference style table with big black rolling chairs. There is a desk in the corner ...
this must be someones office that they use for this smaller meeting that only some people attend
the old man mutters some stuff and asks who wants to lead the meeting today
hmm i didn't know anyone could lead the meeting
HE JUST ASKED ME IF I WANT TO LEAD THE MEETING.....
ummm? i can't say no, that would be rude, but i really don't want to.... FINE.
i take the big book off of the desk and a paper that says what step to cover.. then start the meeting with the serenity prayer and a paragraph highlighted in chapter 3
hope i don't mess this up.....
now i ask everyone to say their name, why they are here, and how long they have been sober since it's a smaller meeting
i'm anxious to know what this highschooler is doing here already...
the lady in her forties talks about how she keeps relapsing and that she has only been a day sober. she talks about how its effecting her kids very negatively, but she just can't stop because she is so stressed. she talks about how her sponsor is helping her out a lot. i tell her that its okay and that people make mistakes, and that all she can do is try and get better. I then explain to her how i feel about my mom and that if anything happened to her or if she died because of something that she could control i'd be devastated. i told her that i look up to my mom. i also told her that i would be understanding if i was her kid because moms have so much stress and are literally always moving. they never get a break. she keeps thanking me
i feel so good for helping her. i feel like i might have said somethings that will stick...
the highschooler tells us that he was in the car drunk when one of his friends got a dui. he said that his parents are making him go to thirty aa meetings in a month...
damn..... i'd say that's an easy punishment. my parents would kill me!
the old man has been sober for thirty years..
holy crap..... thats what we like to call self control... i couldn't even do it and i'm not an alchy!
the guy in his mid twenties has been arrested and taking to the hospital for drinking.... twice. he was handcuffed to the hospital bed. he said there is nothing worse than waking up to that. he doesn't even remember how he got there or that he hit a tree.
what if he would have killed someone or himself? eeek... scary.... hopefully aa will help him so he doesnt inflict pain on himself or anyone else...
i end the meeting with the ' keep coming back keep coming back, it doesn't work if you don't work it' chant...
this just gets everyone in a feel good mood, including me :)
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Artifact/Space Presentation
Upon first hearing about Alcoholics Anonymous I had already painted a picture in my mind of how it went. Whether the media, my fellow peers, or movies helped me paint this picture, it was wrong. I pictured a bunch of low lives walking in with their bottles of booze, tattoos and piercings , with five children trailing behind. For some reason I had always thought of Alcoholics Anonymous to be some kind of joke, where everyone sits in a circle and says, “I’m Taylor, and I’m an alcoholic” This vision I had would soon vanish after attending an official Alcoholics Anonymous meeting. As I walked into the double doors at Fairbanks rehabilitation center in Indianapolis I immediately obtained an extreme sense of comfortableness. There is an old wooden table when you first walk in the double doors. This has pamphlets resting on it informing about anything from Alcoholics to Overeaters. There are baskets on that table as well for the money collection. And lastly a big book, that resembles something of a bible on the table. There are your typical gray, metal plastic chairs all lined up in rows leading to the small, proscenium style stage. On this stage there is a beat up podium where speakers reside. On the walls behind the stage are two large, wooden plaques one on each side of the stage that read, “the twelve steps of Alcoholics Anonymous and the twelve steps of Narcotics Anonymous” The walls offer nothing of aesthetically pleasing value, just plain old boring white. Before the meeting is called in session, there are people standing around talking about anything from the baseball game they went to earlier to something funny their kid had done. Interestingly enough, these people didn’t bring their seven kids to the meeting and they weren’t wearing obnoxious clothing. They were normal everyday people just like us. A leader walks to the podium and begins the meeting with the serenity prayer and talks about what step we are going to cover today from the big book, which is a book full of insightful information regarding the twelve steps. He then calls a boy to the podium to share his life story. With this being said, today I’m going to tell you about what I feel is my focal point and how an artifact plays an important role in not only my focal point, but my space in Alcoholics Anonymous.
Body-
A. Focal Point:
a. The stories of AA members
i. The focal point I have chosen for my subculture is the people’s stories that belong to AA. I feel as if this is the center of activity at an AA meeting. For me, hearing the desperate, but hopeful stories of Alcoholics makes me think of them in a whole new light. Whether that story contains a mother that won’t talk to her daughter anymore, a young kid that killed a family drinking and driving, or an old man that has liver failure due to his addiction – they all give me chills. I have trouble relating to these stories, but I know an inside view is totally different. I think that an insider can relate to all aspects of another beings story. They must feel like they are not alone when they hear these stories. These stories absolutely must help them want to recover also.
B. Artifact:
a. The coins of AA
i. The artifact I have chosen is the coins of AA. Generally speaking they are a memento that you receive on your first day of attending, and your sobriety anniversaries. There are also coins that serve for other functions as well in AA. My artifact fits into my space because it’s something that is acknowledged at every meeting. At each meeting, a leader asks the audience how many days they have been sober. He may say, “Who’s been sober for twenty four hours, a month, a year, ten years, or so on?” Depending on who wants a coin they raise their hand and normally their sponsor presents them with the coin. A sponsor is someone that they hand choose to help guide them through the recovery process. If they are tempted to drink, they can call up their sponsor at any time and they will help them through it because they too have experienced the struggle. The most common coin in AA has the serenity prayer on one side and ‘to thine own self be true’ on the other, with a triangle that states how long they have been sober. This main coin is available in 24 hour, months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18, and years 1-60. These small, but powerful sayings have a huge meaning. The serenity prayer is a constant reminder to the alcoholic that it is time to change. The be true quote means to be true to yourself. To let someone or something else define you can make you lose your ability to discover and grow. It is a constant reminder that in order to find yourself and change you must remember the twelve steps.
ii. This artifact gives the people in AA a sense of accomplishment. It not only serves the function of a gift, but it can also be thought of as a type of currency because it is a coin. With this being said, the coins of AA are very valuable to the people that receive them.
b. The history
i. Early evidence implies that many early members of AA carried around personal mementos to remind themselves how important their sobriety was. Sister Ignatia, a nun who helped the founders start the first official AA meeting at St Thomas in Akron, would give the drunks leaving the hospital a sacred heart medallion and instructed them that if they were going to drink they had the responsibility of bringing the heart medallion back to her before. After this, the tradition was born and incorporated throughout AA history. The coin serves a literal purpose- that being a gift and a symbol- that being sobriety.
Conclusion- My focal point and artifact work hand and hand. Because most people’s stories are about how they became an alcoholic and how they became sober, a reoccurring theme in the AA meetings is sobriety. The coins give an alcoholic that extra encouragement to keep going, as well as hearing the stories of other alcoholics. So now that I have given you a little more information about Alcoholics Anonymous, I hope I have changed the picture in your mind.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Box 16 -verbal snapshot
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Focal Point
Monday, February 15, 2010
box 13
fieldnotes 1
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Today our guest speakers were Desiree Howell and Brandon Schultz. They came to talk about personality types and how they play a role in our society. After taking a test, I found that my personality type was ENFP. Which stands for: extrovert, intuitive, feeling, and perceptive. Which means I am warmly enthusiastic, high-spirited, ingenious, imaginative. I am able to do almost anything that interests me. I am quick with a solution for any difficulty and ready to help anyone with a problem. I often rely on my ability to improvise instead of preparing in advance. I can usually find compellig reasons for whatever they want. After talking about the personalities we figured out that there are established stereotypes about some of the letters. When describing the different types of personalities and what the letters stand for Desiree Howell said, "Sometimes people think that because I am a T for thinking that I am a bitch, or on the other hand are predestined into thinking Brandon is a wuss because he is an F for feeling."1 There are a lot of stereotypes involved with different personality traits. Some people perceive things differently, but for example: Just because someone is an introvert, doesn't mean that they are boring and don't have fun.
1. Howell, Desiree. "Myers-Briggs Type Indicator." 2010 Counseling Center Presentation.
Lafollette, Muncie. 4 Feb. 2010. Lecture.
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Peer Review for Emily Yu
Your Name: Taylor Szalaiy
Writer’s Name: Emily Yu
Does the writer state a thesis at the end of the first paragraph that explains why she wants to study a particular subculture and does s/he make a claim about how his or her view of that subculture has been formed? If you can’t find a thesis point this out here.
If you can find a thesis, rewrite the thesis here:
Being a Taiwanese-Born Asian that has minimal knowledge about the Koreans, I want to learn more about their culture such as; if they have as strict parents as I do, and if they have the similar personality or family background as the Korean dramas that I always watch
Does the thesis make an argument that a reasonable person could disagree with? If yes, what? If no, suggest a thesis based on the paper.
Yes -- she wants to know if her culture is anything like the Korean culture and if what she thinks is true
What subculture is named in the paper?
KSA - Korean Student Association
Could the thesis need to be more concise or more complex?
perfect
Is the thesis specific enough to have meaning? Make a suggestion that pushes the language towards more specific meaning:
yeah ..
How does the essay address the writer’s fixed position in connection with his or her potential subculture? Quote from the paper to explain.
'Dislike seems to be the attitude my family has towards Koreans. I have always learned from my parents that Korean people are extremely mean and cheap, but they are extremely advanced in technology development with extremely stylish fashion'
- She was brought up to feel a certain way about Koreans
- Pick a different word other than extremely
What does the writing tell you about this student’s subjective position? Quote from the paper to explain.
'From the myths that I have heard from my parents, I recently developed some doubts about Korean families'
-Her background as an Asian has given her certain beliefs about the Korean subculture
What does the writing tell you about this student’s textual position?
Quote from the paper to explain.
'All in all, I believe that what I have observed and heard are not all quite the truth about the Koreans'
-She understands her views might be flawed so she wants to research to find out
Does the essay seem like a story or does it seem too formal? Suggest where narrative elements might serve as good examples.
She tells stories about her family and what they think.
Does each paragraph seem to be an appropriate length, with only one main idea per paragraph? If not, what specific suggestions do you have to make this paper better organized?
-New paragraphs for new thoughts..
What suggestions do you have to make the content of this paper better?
-sentence structure.. and its a little choppy
What do you think the strength of this paper is?
-the fact that Koreans and Asians conflict at times and they're both brought up to have certain beliefs about the other subculture
What are the weaknesses?
The sentence structure
What’s missing?
n/a
What’s unnecessary?
talks a little too much about the dramas
Mark on the manuscript any important grammar/spelling mistakes.
Fill out the following chart, adding your comments about each component.
CRITERIA
READER'S COMMENTS
Weak Satisf. Strong
_____ _____ ____X_ Thesis: clear, important, risky
Comments:
_____ _____ X _____ Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility
Comments:
_____ ___X__ _____ Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader
Comments:
_____ __X___ _____ Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation
Comments:
_____ _____ ___X__ Overall effectiveness: Was the relationship between the author’s background and their subculture clear? Were you convinced of the effects?
Comments:
Peer Review for Peter Wilhelm
Writer’s Name: Peter Wilhelm
Does the writer state a thesis at the end of the first paragraph that explains why s/he wants to study a particular subculture and does s/he make a claim about how his or her view of that subculture has been formed? If you can’t find a thesis point this out here.
If you can find a thesis, rewrite the thesis here:
Does the thesis make an argument that a reasonable person could disagree with? If yes, what? If no, suggest a thesis based on the paper.
It’s just not very interesting… spice it up !
What subculture is named in the paper?
The gay community at BSU
Could the thesis need to be more concise or more complex?
More complex.. its too broad
Is the thesis specific enough to have meaning? Make a suggestion that pushes the language towards more specific meaning:
Being friend to a couple gay students at Ball State, …. Say how you feel .. maybe talk about how the stereotypes offend you because you’re friends with them but that you still have learning to do about them?
How does the essay address the writer’s fixed position in connection with his or her potential subculture? Quote from the paper to explain.
Yes….‘When it comes to my topic I think my age group, 17-20 year olds, know the most and are more knowledgeable about it. …. I also believe females tend to know more gay people than males. I think this because gay guys feel more comfortable telling women that they are gay.’
What does the writing tell you about this student’s subjective position? Quote from the paper to explain.
Yes….‘As for my background, I know many gay people mostly because I have a lot who live on my floor, many of whom I am friends with.’
-he gives a background as to why he thinks he should be the one speaking about gays
What does the writing tell you about this student’s textual position?
Quote from the paper to explain.
Yes… ‘My reasons for choosing the gay community at Ball State are neither negative nor positive. I am simply hoping to gain more knowledge about the gays because they are a very large and foreign subculture.’
--maybe explain a little more
Does the essay seem like a story or does it seem too formal? Suggest where narrative elements might serve as good examples.
Perfect… Not too formal, not too story like…. He tells about his gay friends which helps… he could maybe describe them a little bit more though.
Does each paragraph seem to be an appropriate length, with only one main idea per paragraph? If not, what specific suggestions do you have to make this paper better organized?
Yes.. changes subjects with paragraphs
What suggestions do you have to make the content of this paper better?
-Not be as repetitive and irrelevant .. Describe things a little more.. More emotions and make it more personal..?
What do you think the strength of this paper is?
-The fact that he as friends that are gay and he is a straight guy… but still respects the gay community
What are the weaknesses?
-The sentence structure
What’s missing?
-Personality
What’s unnecessary?
-Explaining that its ‘fixed’ , or it’s ‘research’ etc…. he should find a different way to say it without using the words
Mark on the manuscript any important grammar/spelling mistakes.
Fill out the following chart, adding your comments about each component.
CRITERIA
READER'S COMMENTS
Weak Satisf. Strong
____X_ _____ _____ Thesis: clear, important, risky
Comments:
_____ ____X_ _____ Evidence: relevance, strength, credibility
Comments:
_____ _____ ___X__ Organization: arrangement of ideas, guiding the reader
Comments:
_____ ___X__ _____ Mechanics: spelling, grammar, punctuation
Comments:
_____ _____ __X___ Overall effectiveness: Was the relationship between the author’s background and their subculture clear? Were you convinced of the effects?
Comments: